Monday, September 30, 2019

International Translation Day (ITD) 2019

Copyright © Françoise Herrmann

Today is International Translation Day (ITD).

September 30th was declared ITD on May 24,2017, when the UN General Assembly adopted Resolution 71/288 on The role of language professionals in connecting nations and fostering peace, understanding and development. 

Official FIT ITD 2019 poster
September 30th is also the Day of the Feast of Saint Jerome, in the Catholic Liturgical Calendar. The Feast of Saint Jerome is the day that FIT (the Fédération Internationale des Traducteurs / International Federation of Translators) initially selected for ITD, which was celebrated for many years prior to UN recognition. The Day of the Feast of Saint Jerome was selected, because Saint Jerome is known to have provided the first translation of the bible from the Old Testament in Hebrew to Latin, in the 4th century AD. Saint Jerome’s Latin version of the bible is known as The Vulgate (meaning "the commonly used" version of the bible). At that time, during the 4th century AD, a Greek translation of the Old Testament in Hebrew existed. The Greek translation of the Old Testament in Hebrew was called The Septuagint (meaning "the 70" or the version translated by 70 scholars), which Saint Jerome was also commissioned to revise by the Pope Damascus I.

The theme for this year’s celebration of ITD is connected to the celebration of 2019 as the International Year of Indigenous Languages (IYIL 2019). A year of celebrations launched at the UNESCO, at the beginning of 2019, on January 28, in Paris. IYIL2019 is intended both to raise awareness and to mobilize action on preserving endangered languages, estimated at 40% of the existing 6700 world languages. Indigenous languages support cultures and knowledge systems that are usually marginalized both politically and economically. Thus, in celebrating Indigenous languages as this year’s theme for ITD, the focus is on the capacity for translation both to include speakers of indigenous languages in larger conversations in support of their rights, and to widen access to services and information in indigenous native languages.

Indigenous languages and the people who speak them contribute to the knowledge, wealth and diversity of the global community. For example, indigenous knowledge (IK) in patenting activity is a striking example of both the extent of the indigenous contributions, and how translation might be of specific service to the causes that are being celebrated.

Indigenous knowledge (IK) also termed Traditional Knowledge (TK) is often passed down from one generation to the next in an oral tradition. For the purposes of determining the patentability of an invention, inventors and examiners are required in part to research the prior art of the claimed invention, arising in print. When none of the knowledge is printed, indigenous communities lose their claim to prior art and to a potential invention, plus all the financial and economic advantages that might ensue, after the patent is granted. In Vandana Shiva’s terms, this is more than loss, it is theft or "plunder" (e.g.; Shiva, 2000). 

Accordingly, certain US and European patents (e.g.; US5401504, EP436257) have been revoked, once the prior art was brought in as printed evidence, translated to an official language of the patent-granting agency, for re-examination. Likewise, the archiving of IK has begun at such institutions as India's TKDL (Traditional Knowledge Digital Library) and the UN WIPO TK (Traditional Knowledge) portal, where the IK is also translated to the official languages of the Intellectual Property [IP] Offices, enabling IK databases to be searched for prior art. 


References
History World
ITD 2019 - FIT - (Fédération Internationale des Traducteurs / International Federation of Translators) 
India – TKDL – Traditional Knowledge Digital Library
Saint Jerome 
Shiva, V. (2002) Protect or plunder: Understanding Intellectual Property Rights. London, UK: ZED Books. 
UN – ITD – International Translation Day 
UN – Resolution 71/288 – May 24, 2017 - The role of professional translation in connecting nations and fostering peace, understanding and development 
UN- UNESCO –IYIL - 2019 Year of Indigenous languages 
WIPO – World Intellectual Property Organization – Traditional Knowledge http://www.wipo.int/tk/en/tk/

Friday, September 27, 2019

Oh, patents! Pandora Jewelry (2)

Copyright © Françoise Herrmann


On the occasion of the launch of the Pandora jewelry Autumn 2019 collection, the company commissioned 7 women artists to paint the downtown LA jewelry district in pink. Here a YouTube video of the artists and the fabulous artwork they produced.


Listed and hyperlinked below, the 15-member patent family reciting the Pandora jewelry charm bunching-prevention invention.
  • US2004144131 (A1) ― 2004-07-29 Necklaces and bracelets with keepers
  • AT387869 (T) ― 2008-03-15 - Necklaces and bracelets with keepers
  • AU2004258928 (A1) ― 2005-02-03 - Necklaces and bracelets with keepers
  • CN1826066 (A) ― 2006-08-30 - Necklaces and bracelets with keepers
  • CY1107955 (T1) ― 2013-09-04 - Necklaces and bracelets with keepers
  • DE602004012285 (T2) ― 2009-03-12 - Necklaces and bracelets with keepers
  • DK1657991 (T3) ― 2008-06-30 - Necklaces and bracelets with keepers  
  • EP1657991 (A2) ― 2006-05-24 - Necklaces and bracelets with keepers
  • ES2305854 (T3) ― 2008-11-01 - Necklaces and bracelets with keepers
  • NO329465 (B1) ― 2010-10-25 - Necklaces and bracelets with keepers 
  • NZ544823 (A) ― 2008-12-24 - Necklaces and bracelets with keepers to allow ornamental members to be separated from each other and not "bunch up"
  • PT1657991 (E) ― 2008-06-12 - Necklaces and bracelets with keepers
  • US2006117795 (A1) ― 2006-06-08 - Necklaces and bracelets with keepers
  • WO2005009166 (A2) ― 2005-02-03 - Necklaces and bracelets with keepers
  • ZA200600198 (B) ― 2007-03-28 - Necklaces and bracelets with keepers 
References
Pandora jewelry  [DK] website

Thursday, September 26, 2019

Oh, patents! Pandora Jewelry (1)


Copyright © Françoise Herrmann

Pandora jewelry, unconnected to Pandora, the Music Genome Project®, or Pandora’s Box in Greek mythology, is patented jewelry. Actually, it is the system of “keepers” that prevent charms, baubles and beads, attached to a Pandora bracelet or necklace from bunching, that is specifically patented in Pandora jewelry.

Just in case you are unfamiliar with Pandora jewelry, the company was founded by the husband and wife team Per Enevoldsen and Winnie Liljeborg, in Copenhagen, Denmark, in 1982. Pandora jewelry, as it is now known worldwide, is all about customization. Customization with hundreds of different charms and Murano glass beads that enable women to mark the meaningful milestones of their lives, and to express life’s special moments, in the creation of their bracelets and necklaces.

 The signature Pandora charm bracelet concept, enabling personal expression of lifestyles and life stories, was launched in 2000, with production to follow in Gemopolis, Thailand. In 2006, the first Pandora concept store opened in Hamburg, Germany. Since then, 2700 Pandora jewelry concept stores have opened worldwide, and two more manufacturing plants opened in Thailand to keep up with the demand for charms, and other jewelry pieces of the Pandora product lines. Indeed, 630 million charms have been sold worldwide since 2000. The state-of-the-art Thailand factory that opened in 2017 was also awarded LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) Gold Certification. Finally, since 2010, Pandora is a public company, trading on the NASDAK OMX stock exchange, in Copenhagen, Denmark.  

The patented bunching-prevention aspect of Pandora jewelry is recited in a family of 15 patents, including the US utility patent US7007507B2, titled Necklaces and bracelets with keepers. Essentially, the invention consists in any number of threaded or unthreaded bands, fixed on the bracelet or necklace strand, to which threaded or hinged keepers are attached.  The keepers restrict the movement of the beads on the necklace or bracelet strand, thus preventing them from bunching. Keepers are decorative in a way that adds to the decorative effect of the necklace. Keepers can be of any shape, and they are manufactured inexpensively with no adverse effects of the environment.

The abstract for  US7007507B2 is included below, together with the patent drawings Figure 4 and 5.
This invention is a necklace or bracelet with provisions to prevent the bunching of baubles, bangles and beads which are strung on the necklace or bracelet. Bunching is prevented by keepers which are removably attached to bands fixed at intervals on the strands of the necklaces or bracelets. Two types of keepers are disclosed, one of which has internal threads which interact with a threaded bands, and one which uses a clamshell structure to secure the keeper on a band. The keepers may have a variety of shapes for decorative effects, such as cylindrical, spherical, cubical, or pyramid shaped. [Abstract US7007507B2]




Figure 5 shows a Pandora necklace(*) without beads or keepers attached, just the two threaded 71 and unthreaded 76 bands, fixed on the strand(*) 60, with hook 15 and loop 12 closure. The two bands 71 and 76, fixed to the strand 60, are designed to enable attachment of the keepers (shown in Fig. 4) that will prevent bunching of beads(*), on the strand 60.

Figure 4 shows a plan view of a Pandora necklace with a cross-sectional view of keepers and beads attached to the necklace strand. Specifically, the patent Figure 4 drawing depicts the necklace strand 60 with hook and loop closure, the threaded band 71 with threads 72 fixed on the strand 60, suited for attachment of the keeper 30 with threads 34. The bore of the keeper 30 is designed so that it can cooperate with the fixed threaded band 71 of the strand 60. Similarly, on the other side of the strand 60, a clamshell hinged keeper 40 is shown closed and attached to a fixed and unthreaded band 76 of the strand 60, with the bore of the keeper 40, designed so that it can cooperate with the band 76 without moving, once the keeper 40  is closed.  Figure 4 also shows beads 70 strung on the strand 60. The bores 78 of the beads are designed so that the bead can slip over the hook or loop closure of the necklace, the threaded 71 and unthreaded 76 bands fixed on the strand 60,  but not past the keepers 40 and 30, once they are both threaded or attached to the strand 60.

An image of a marketed Pandora bracelet(*) is also included. This bracelet is marketed as the Pandora Rose™ In My Heart Bracelet.  It comes with two cubic-zirconia-studded clamshell keepers (called clips), and one heart charm with multicolored crystals, in between both clips. Because of the two clips, the existing charm, and any charms added to customize the bracelet, will not slip and slide around the whole bracelet.



Note (*)
In the definition of terms of this patent:
“application body adornments such as necklaces, bracelets, anklets, waist chains are termed "necklaces". Flexible chains, wire cables, bands, filaments, cords, strings, which are a component of the necklaces are termed "strands". Baubles, bangles, pendants, trinkets, and beads which are strung on a strand are termed "beads". [US7007507B2, left column, lines 9-14, p. 3] [Bold face chars mine] 

References
Pandora jewelry  [DK] website
Pandora Music Genome Project®

Thursday, September 19, 2019

Rimsky-Korsakov's Bombas (not socks)

Copyright © Françoise Herrmann


Flight of the bumblebee by Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov [1844-1908]
Original orchestra arrangement, 
part of the Rimsky-Korsakov opera The Tale of Tsar Saltan


Flight of the bumblebee by Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov [1844-1908]
Arrangement for piano by Sergei Rachmaninoff [1873-1943]


Flight of the bumblebee by Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov [1844-1908]
Arrangement for flute, played by Sir James Galway, and piano, played by Phillip Moll 

Thursday, September 12, 2019

Oh, patents! Bombas® (not bombs)*

Copyright © Françoise Herrmann

Have you recently received your No Show Bombas® flyer in the mail?  If you have, then you already know that Bombas® are not only purported the most comfortable socks, they are also socks with a mission.

Buy a pair, and Bombas® Inc., will donate a pair. This kind of mathematics adds up to 24 million pairs already donated.  None too many, since the flyer also informs you that socks are the #1 most requested clothing item in homeless shelters.

Scroll forward. Bombas® sold 1 million pairs of socks in the first 2 years (about 1000 pairs per day). Bombas Inc., currently has a 400% growth rate! Everyone loves Bombas®! If you are not wearing a pair of Bombas®, you might be wondering, why?

The short answer is simply: They feel better and look better. The long answer is found in the overlooked niche of sock engineering, the art of manufacturing more comfortable, softer and more supportive socks. 

Succinctly, the company found no less than seven ways of improving on the materials used for manufacturing super-soft socks, mostly made of Pima cotton and Merino wool fibers, with natural moisture-wicking and anti-microbial properties. Bombas® also found a way of removing the uncomfortable toe seam on all of its socks, hand-stitching them instead. They added cushioning on the footbed without making it too bulky. Calf socks are also engineered with a special tension called “Stay-up” technology. Similarly, the no-show socks have a “Stay-put” technology, using a combination contour seam and tiny silicon heel strips. Ankle socks have a blister tab, providing extra cushioning above the heel to prevent chafing and rubbing. The heel portion of all Bombas® socks are Y-stitched, offering a cup-shape for heels. Finally, Bombas® socks are also manufactured with a special honeycomb design that hugs the arch of your foot, distributing pressure evenly throughout the arch, thus providing added comfort and support. 

Add fabulous colors and fun patterns to all the smart engineering, and the rest is history!

The Bombas® honeycomb design is patented in the US design patent USD723261S, titled Sock. As a reminder: “a utility patent” protects the way an article is used and works (35 U.S.C. 101), while a “design patent” protects the way an article looks (35 U.S.C. 171) [MPEP Chapt. 1502.01; [R-07.2015]].

Included below, the patent Figures 1 and 8, respectively showing the honeycomb design on ankle (Fig. 8) and calf (Fig. 1) socks. Also included below, a corresponding image of marketed calf and ankle Bombas®, displaying the Bombas® sock technology that has changed the destiny of feet!


























_________________

*Incidentally, per the company’s website, Bombas® (the company name) is derived from the Latin “bombus” the “buzz” or “humming” sound of “bumblebees” or “busy bees”, not bombas meaning “bombs”. This explains the company logo that displays a queen bee with her crown and the honeycomb design. 

Bombas Inc. puts it this way:
“Derived from the Latin word for bumblebee. Bees live in a hive and work together to make their world a better place. They're small, but their combined actions have a big impact on the world. We like that. That's why our mantra is bee better. We put this reminder inside each Bombas clothing item as a reminder that little improvements can add up to make a big difference, and that your purchase went towards directly helping someone in need.”
References
Bombas (website)
www.bombas.com
How popular inventions came to life: Bombas socks
https://ip.com/blog/popular-patents-bombas-socks/
MPEP – Chapt. 1502-01 – Distinction between design and utility patent
https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s1502.html

Wednesday, September 11, 2019

Oh, patents! Rothy's 4 kids

Copyright © Françoise Herrmann


Also knitted out of yarn made from recycled plastic bottles, Rothy’s kids shoes come in the cutest loafers and slip-on sneaker styles. Styles that might vary in as many ways as there are computer-mediated knitting patterns and stitches created to generate new models for kids. 

For example, Rothy’s  special edition of kids’ shoes, in collaboration with the NY Times best-selling children’s book illustrator, Pete Oswald, generated four pairs of 8 different knitted, slip-on sneakers. The four model pairs (shown below) include: a purple cat (on one shoe) chasing the grey mice (on the other shoe), a monkey (on one shoe) picking bananas (on the other shoe), a mama elephant (on one shoe), showering her baby elephant (on the other shoe), and pink flamingos facing each other.


Rererences 
Pete Oswald
Rothy’s

Tuesday, September 10, 2019

Oh, patents! Rothy’s shoes

Copyright © Françoise Herrmann

Rothy’s shoes are vibrantly colored and green all over– with no contradiction in terms. Indeed, Rothy’s shoes are green because the uppers are knitted with fibers made from recycled plastic bottles. As a result, more than 30 million plastic bottles have been recycled and diverted from landfills since the shoemaker set up shop, three years ago. In turn, this manufacturing process contributes to the planetary effort to reduce the production of greenhouse gasses, assumed responsible for global warming and its effect on climate change.

The shoe knitting process, now commonly used by big brand name sports shoes (e.g. Nike flyknit), enables the manufacturing of uppers as a single piece, with no leftovers. This saves on all the waste associated with the prior state of the art of upper manufacturing, consisting in a cut-out process. A cut-out process, where shoe uppers are templated on a large sheet of leather, fabric or man-made leather, leaving many pieces of the sheet unused between each cut-out upper.

Rothy’s soles are also green, made of carbon-free, recyclable rubber and TPU (Thermolastic PolyUrethane), while the insoles are made from recycled foam, which is also washable. Indeed, Rothy’s shoes are completely machine-washable!

Rothy’s adult shoes come in just four styles: point, loafer, slip-on sneaker and flat. However, the new knitting process allows for a striking array of different colors and computer–generated patterns and stitches. 

The basic design of Rothy’s shoes is patented in the family of US design patents, listed below.
 As a reminder: “a utility patent” protects the way an article is used and works (35 U.S.C. 101), while a “design patent” protects the way an article looks (35 U.S.C. 171) [MPEP Chapt. 1502.01; [R-07.2015]].

Included below, the patent Figures 1 and 3, respectively showing a front right perspective and rear heel perspective of the Rothy's shoe design, together with corresponding images of the marketed Rothy's shoes. Both patent Figures are extracted from  USD844313Sthe most recent member of the Rothy's US design patent family.  



Reference
Rothy’s shoes
MPEP – Chapt. 1502-01 – Distinction between design and utility patent

Tuesday, September 3, 2019

Interlude - Warhol's Samcats

Copyright © Françoise Herrmann


Andy Warhol's divine Samcats were printed in a small edition of books. The Samcat prints included below appear in Book #69, which includes the following preface:
This Edition consists of 100 copies which have been printed by Seymour Berlin. This is copy 69. 25 cats named Sam and one Blue was written by Charles Lisanby. Mr. Andy Warhol
To my absolute delight, sixteen Samcats and the Blue cat were on video-exhibit at the Andy Warhol: From A to B and back again retrospective show, at the San Francisco MOMA (May 19 - Sept. 2, 2019). The pictures below were taken with my Iphone as they looped on screen. 



Reference
SFMOMA - Andy Warhol: From A to B and back again. Retrospective show May 19-Sept. 2, 2019