Monday, October 13, 2014

Oh, patents! OAPI - Rising IP star in French-speaking Africa

Copyright © Françoise Herrmann
The OAPI, (pronounced as an acronym "ooapi" meaning in French, Organisation Africaine de la Propriété Intellectuelle, or in English AIPO – African Intellectual Property Organization [OAPI (1)], was created according to the provisions of the Bangui Agreement, ratified in the Central African Republic, in 1977 [OAPI (2)] . 
The OAPI (AIPO) currently regroups 17 members states from Central and French-speaking Africa, including: Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, the Central African Republic, Chad, the Comoro Islands, Congo, the Ivory Coast, Gabon, Guinea, Equatorial Guinea, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Guinea Bissau, Senegal and Togo.  
Headquarters of the OAPI (AIPO) are located in Yaoundé, Cameroon, and there are National Liaison Offices for the OAPI in each of the member countries [OAPI (3)], acting both as National offices and central agencies, providing information, training and a location for filing applications. The OAPI (AIPO), like its counterparts in Europe (EPO) and at the United Nations (WIPO), offers a central agency for information, training, filing and examination of applications. Fees are paid a single time for protection in all member states. The OAPI (AIPO) also offers a graduate level Masters program in Intellectual Property. A new logo for the OAPI (AIPO) was unveiled in Sept 2014 in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso (see image included above).

The bibliographic data sheets of patents granted by the OAPI (AIPO) are published in the official OAPI newsletter Bulletin Officiel de la Propriété Intellectuelle (BOPI). The latest issue of the OAPI BOPI, No. 12R/2013, dated October 3, 2014, published 44 bibliographic data sheets for recently granted OAPI (AIPO) patents. There are a total of 16215 patents granted by the OAPI (AIPO).
----

NB. The AIPO (OAPI) should not be confused with the ARIPO – the African Regional Intellectual Property Organization, headquartered in Harare, Zimbawe, which regroups 19 English-speaking African countries, including: Botswana, The Gambia, Ghana, Kenya, Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, Sierra Leone, Liberia, Rwanda, São Tomé and Principe, Somalia, Sudan, Swazilan, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, and Zimbawe. The ARIPO was created in 1976 according to the provisions of the Lusaka Agreement, ratified in Zambia.

References

OAPI (1) Organisation Africaine de la Propriété Intellectuelle
http://www.oapi.int/ OAPI (2) Accord de Bangui
http://www.oapi.int/index.php/en/aipo/cadre-juridique/accord-de-banguiOAPI (3) BOPI – Bulletin Officiel de la Propriété Intellectuelle, 12BR/2013, p. 8. http://www.oapi.int/bopi/brevet/BOPI_12BR2013.pdfARIPO – African Regional Intellectual Property Organization

Wednesday, October 1, 2014

International Translation Day 2014

Copyright © Françoise Herrmann

Oopse… that was yesterday, on September 30, 2014, the Feast of Saint Jerome, according to the Saints’ Days of the Gregorian calendar. 

Saint Jerome was the first to translate the Old Testament of the Bible from Ancient Hebrew to Latin, in the year 405 AC, at a time where translations of the bible existed only from Greek (translated from Hebrew) to Latin. Thus, it is in his capacity as first translator of the bible that Saint Jerome is considered the Patron Saint of Translators, in a Christian calendar tradition that assigns patron saints to just about every profession. For example, Saint Nicholas (December 25) is Patron Saint of bakers, Saint Francis (October 4) is Patron Saint of ecologists, Saint Matthew (September 21) is Patron Saint of bankers, accountants and stockbrokers, Saint Lucy (December 13) is Patron Saint of writers and electricians (!), and so forth for every day of the Gregorian calendar, commonly used in the Western world.

International Translation Day was launched by the IFT - International Federation of Translators, a European-based organization founded in 1953 that regroups more than 100 professional associations of translators, interpreters and terminologists worldwide, including the American Translators Association. The IFT thus represents more than 80,000 translators in 55 countries. 

Each year the IFT selects a theme for International Translation Day. The 2014 theme was “Language rights: essential to all human rights”. Indeed this is the idea that Human Rights to dignity, freedom, justice, health and peace for all human beings, as set forth in the provisions of the 1948 UN Declaration of Human Rights, are contingent upon effective communication. In other words, it is impossible to uphold and defend human rights without the ability to communicate in a language that is mutually understandable. Take the case, for example, of immigrants, asylum seekers, refugees, tourists or foreign workers, who lose their linguistic rights in courts, hospitals or government offices when they are unable to defend themselves, or express themselves or explain their situation in the language into which they are thrown. 

The IFT thus calls for a greater awareness of the need for professional linguistic services, to avoid the tragedies of injustice, imprisonment and irreversible damages to health arising in those situations where people cannot express or defend themselves in a language that is mutually understandable.

Mark your calendars for International Translation Day on September 30, 2015 with another theme. And in the interim, spread the word! 

Reference
International Federation of Translators
www.fit-ift.org

October 1, 2014 - World Vegetarian Day

Copyright © Françoise Herrmann






And food for thought ...

Joy, M. (2010) Why we love dogs, eat pigs and wear cows: An introduction to Carnism. The belief system that enables us to eat some animals and not others. San Francisco, CA : Conari Press

Safran Foer, J. (2009) Eating animals. New York, NY: Little, Brown & Co.

Singer, P. (1975) Animal Liberation: A new ethics for our treatment of animals. New York, NY: The Hearst Corporation.



Sunday, September 28, 2014

Patents for Humanity 2013 – Identifying counterfeit drugs

Copyright © Françoise Herrmann

It is controversial enough that patented and life-saving drugs are often unavailable for treatment in Third World countries, for reasons ranging from costs and licensing fees [Chneiweiss, 2003] to distribution bottlenecks [Esmail, et al., 2010] and drug development protocols [WHO3, 2014]. But there are other problems plaguing the delivery of drugs to places like Sub-Saharan Africa and South East Asia. One such problem is the Black Market of counterfeit drugs and health-related products [WHO2, 2006; WHO4]. A market estimated (with obvious difficulty) to operate, per year, at various significant amounts, in the billions of dollars, according to different sources (e.g.; 32 billion USD per year in 2011 with a 5-year projected amount of 62 billion USD [Global HealthCare, 2011], or at an estimated 75 billion USD in 2014 according to the WHO [WHO5]). Also a market responsible for the deaths of many thousands of people per year [WHO5].

There are no less than 131 WHO (World Health Organization) Drug Alerts for known falsified or contaminated pharmaceutical products, such as for example:  antimalarial drugs with less than 2% of the active ingredient; emergency contraceptives with no active ingredient; cough syrup with a contaminated active ingredient causing the death of at least 50 people; tainted anti-angina heart medicine also causing deaths, and tainted anti-meningitis medication in 1995 causing 2500 deaths in Nigeria [WHO1].

In response to the dangers and toll of counterfeit drugs, Sproxil, Inc. developed a simple to use, text message and mobile phone-based technology to uncover counterfeit medicine, in direct communication with the pharmaceutical industry or third party data processing centers.

This technology, invented by Gogo Ashifi and Zecha Alden, was awarded the patent US13081882 titled SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VERIFYING AUTHENTICITY OF A PRODUCT and was also selected in 2013 as recipient of a USPTO Patent for Humanity Award.
 
The invention discloses patented tamper-evident packaging with a unique identifier, located within or as part of the tamper-evident packaging. The identifier is additionally sensitive to environmental conditions. This bonus part of the invention means, for example, that if the product is sensitive to heat, then the identifier will also signal exposure to heat, at the level or length of time deemed detrimental to the product, using calibrated and heat-sensitive ink. In other words, environmental conditions are included in the definition of tampering, and there is no intervention required on the part of the end-user to determine whether the product is damaged.
 
Thus, to determine the authenticity of a product,  the end-user just sends the product code (with a few more visible digits considering heat reactions, whenever this applies) via text-message and receives an instantaneous response to indicate the validity of the product or other information such as “recalled”, “used” “stolen” or “diverted” etc., that may be tagged to the unique code.

Below appears the abstract for US13081882, titled SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VERIFYING AUTHENTICITY OF A PRODUCT:
Various aspects of the invention provide systems and method for verifying authenticity of a product. Another aspect of the invention provides a system including: a tamper-evident package; and a unique identifier usable to verify the authenticity of the product, the unique identifier contained within the tamper-evident package. The unique identifier cannot be detected from outside of the tamper-evident package without demonstrating evidence of tampering. Another aspect of the invention provides a system including: a tamper-evident package; and a concealed unique identifier coupled to the tamper-evident package. Another aspect of the invention provides a method of providing a providing a unique identifier. The method includes: providing a tamper-evident package; and placing the unique identifier within the tamper-evident package, wherein the unique identifier cannot be detected from outside of the tamper-evident package. [Abstract US13081882] 

Although this invention was designed to address the problem of counterfeit drugs in the Third World where it is endemic, and the invention was the recipient of a 2013 USPTO Humanitarian Award, the scope of the invention is clearly much broader. Indeed, the invention has broader and disclosed applications to other counterfeit consumer products that are packaged or labeled, such as electronic media, foodstuff, luxury goods, cosmetics..etc.  And this invention also has a broader client (or patient) base than the recognized Third World parties, since the United States is also plagued with counterfeit medicine, albeit at an estimated lesser degree than the Third World [FDA1]. 
 
 
 
References
Chneiweiss, H. (2003) Sur les rivages de la misère : Épisode 1 : Le marché des médicaments essentiels. M/S – Médecine Sciences,  vol 19(8&9), pp. 892-894.
Esmail, L. C., Phillips, K., Kuek, V., Perez Cosio, A.  and J. C. Kohler  (2010) Framing access to medicines in developing countries: An analysis of media coverage of Canada’s Access to Medicine Regime, BMC International Human Rights, 10(1).
[FDA1] – Counterfeit Medicine
[Global Healthcare] – 2011 The financial pull of counterfeit drugs
[WHO2]  (2006) - Combating counterfeit drugs: A concept paper for effective international cooperation.
http://www.who.int/medicines/events/FINALBACKPAPER.pdf  
[WHO3] – Ethical considerations for the use of unregistered interventions for Ebola Virus disease
[WHO4] – General information on counterfeit medicine
[WHO5] Growing threat from counterfeit medicines

Thursday, September 11, 2014

Patents for Humanity – USPTO Awards Program

Copyright © Françoise Herrmann

The USPTO call for submissions to the Patents for Humanity program is extended to October 31, 2014. 

This competitive program, organized by the USPTO (United States Patent and TradeMark Office), is designed to recognize patent owners, assignees and applicants, whether businesses, non-profits or universities, who have contributed a patented invention for humanitarian purposes. In particular, this means an invention that is designed to help underserved populations of the world and/or uses technology to solve major global problems, in five categories: medicine, nutrition, sanitation, household energy and living standards. 

The program's 10 awards and 6 honorable mentions reward the selected winners with public recognition at a USPTO sponsored awards ceremony and acceleration of certain USPTO processes related to a patent application, such as the application process, ex parte reexam, or an ex parte appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

The program was piloted in 2012 as part of President Obama’s Global Development Initiative, “encouraging game-changing innovations to solve long-standing development challenges” and the program was renewed in February 2014 (USPTO Press Release, 2014). 

The 2013 Patents for Humanity awards included such recipients as:
  • UC Berkeley (UCB) for ways of producing lower cost and more reliable anti-malarial compounds; 
  • Becton Dickinson (BD) for creating a fast, accurate TB diagnosis machine and placing 300 systems in 22 High Burden Countries, and
  • Sproxil, Inc., for deploying a system to identify counterfeit drugs with an ordinary cell phone in sub-Saharan Africa (Patents for humanity, 2013).
The USPTO screened and accepted list of contending entries for this year’s 2014 Patents for humanity awards is displayed in a public gallery at: https://p4h.skild.com/skild2/p4h/viewEntryVoting.action

Among the 2014 contending inventions, there are four such viewable applications:
  •  Device to prevent hypothermia in pre-term babies in low resource setting - The device is called the IncuPouch™, the inventor is Prasanga Lokuge, and the entry concerns the humanitarian use of technology described in US 20120234877 A1 titled Infant carrier and US 20080149674 A1 titled Infant Carrier.
  • Cardiopulmonary lightening protection garment – a garment made of conductive fabric that prevents lightening from passing through the body and causing cardiopulmonary arrest. The company is Zoltar Technology, the inventor is Dan Schlager, and technology used for humanitarian purposes is described in US 20130298319 A1 titled Cardiopulmonary lightening protection garment. 
  • Portable neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) – a unit with reduced electrical power requirements that provides both heat, or cooling, for the infant patient, using water circulating through a heat exchanger. The company is called Designs for the world, LLC, the devices are called the Tokü™ incubators and the technology used for humanitarian purposes is described in US 20100168502 A1 titled Modular neonatal intensive care system.
  • Disaster Emergency Assessment Notification (DEAN) – A mobile app designed to track people in an emergency situation using QR codes. (Blaster Communications Inc.) 

Considering the 45-day extension period for filing entries, there is still time to compete! Here is the link for submitting application forms: 

References
- Press release: USPTO renews Patents for Humanity Program
http://www.uspto.gov/news/pr/2014/14-10.jsp
- Patents for humanity 2013 Award recipients
http://www.uspto.gov/patents/init_events/patents_for_humanity/awards2013.jsp

Monday, August 25, 2014

Interlude

Copyright © Françoise Herrmann
-- Ok, Buddy – you, translator, homotraducens, verbal acrobat, barber, pirate, juggler, builder of bridges and cathedrals, collector of words, detective, invisible author, hybrid being, go-between, textual geologist, scribe without a face, heathen and enemy of God:  Where are your credentials and qualifications?  Z-Mapp, Ebola… you are just the unknown soldier of culture, at best a locksmith and stylistic recycler… (Extrapolated from Delisle, 2007, translations mine).

-- Thanks! As usual you are so tactful in your selection of attributions! How about ventriloquist and chameleon…  or simply informed?
 
Anyhow, truth be told, I borrowed ‘em. And here’s another “hand-me-down” -- verbatum from the distinguished 12-member panel of the WHO Advisory Committee on Ethical Considerations for use of unregistered interventions for Ebola virus disease, a panel which includes the NIH Head of Section on Ethics and Health Policy, among 11 colleagues, doctors and professors each chairing ethics committees of various sorts, in different countries of the world. The concluding and unanimous recommendation of the panel amounting to an unprecedented exception in rules and regulations, motivated by ethical concerns, and in a grave situation, namely:  
“In the particular context of the current Ebola outbreak in West Africa, it is ethically acceptable to offer unproven interventions that have shown promising results in the laboratory and in animal models but have not yet been evaluated for safety and efficacy in humans as potential treatment or prevention.” [WHO]

 -- So there! Mind you there is much more information to process… about z-Mapp, the patented monoclonal antibody medicine where tobacco plants are used to make recombinant proteins, I am told. And on the social side of this epidemic, the stigma and extreme hardship of the containment measures.


References
Delisle, J. (2007) La traduction en citations. Ottawa, Canada : Presses de l’université d’Ottawa.  
WHO – Ethical considerations for the use of unregistered interventions for Ebola Virus disease
http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/130997/1/WHO_HIS_KER_GHE_14.1_eng.pdf?ua=1

Sunday, August 24, 2014

Oh, patents! Z-Mapp

Copyright © Françoise Herrmann

According to the WHO (World Health Organization) Ebola virus disease Updates in West Africa, 
“Between Aug, 19 and Aug. 20, 2014, a total of 142 new cases of Ebola virus disease (laboratory-confirmed, probable and suspected) and 77 deaths were reported from Guinea, Liberia, Nigeria and Sierra Leone” (WHO1 – GAR1). 

As of Aug 20, 2014, according to the same WHO Global Alert and Response (GAR) page, there were 1427 deaths and 2617 cases reported. Ebola virus has a case fatality rate of up to 90%. It is one of the world’s most virulent diseases. The current survival rate in this epidemic is 47%. (WHO2-GAR)

The question that arises almost immediately is whether there is a cure for this deadly disease, and/or for preventing it from spreading any further, both locally in the villages or crowded cities of the infected areas, and internationally across borders and continents -- to Europe and the rest of the world.  Indeed the extraordinary measures of isolation that were taken to bring home for treatment two infected American missionaries,  Dr Kent Brantly and Nancy Writebol, who both survived the disease, serve to further highlight the issue of treatment and access to it.

The usual scenario in connection to patented drugs and access to treatment is one of prohibitive costs, and the monopolies associated with the marketing and production of the drugs. For example, this is the well documented case of antiretroviral drugs for the treatment of Aids (Chneiweiss, 2013).  However, the availability of treatment for Edola virus disease is different in important ways that highlight a different set of ethical issues in the access to patented treatments.

The issue here pertains to a patented drug referred to as Z-Mapp, which is still in the pre-clinical stages of testing. This means that the drug, developed by Mapp Biopharmaceuticals Inc., with the support of the United States government (CDC and DoD), has only been tested in the laboratory, on animals or in test tubes, and has not yet completed the full cycle of clinical testing with humans required for assessing safety and effectiveness of the drug. A process required prior to obtaining authorization to market a drug, and specified in the provisions of US Federal Regulations Title 45, Part 46 on The Protection of human subjects, or equivalent European legislation, such as for example, France’s Code de la Santé Publique, Livre 1er, Titre II pertaining to biomedical research.,  

Who cares?  What other options beyond the miraculous are there for those people infected with the Ebola virus? If the two US missionaries survived the Ebola virus infection to return home to their families, virus free, after treatment with this experimental Z-Mapp drug, then this is already human cllinical testing with grand scale control…Well, that’s the gist of it, minus  roll-out issues. [CDC –Ebola Hemorrhagic Fever]

 Indeed the decision to make this Investigational New  Drug (IND) available under specific conditions within the context of this Ebola outbreak was unanimously approved by the WHO on August 11, 2014 [WHO3- Ethical Committee Report]. So that in a rare, and perhaps ground-breaking instance, communication finally completed in real time, between all the parties involved in the process of developing the drugs and those subjects and patients, for whom the drugs are intended in the first place – our not-so-distant neighbors in a globally connected world --infected with the Ebola virus.

Z-Mapp is patented in US2013149300 titled MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES WITH ALTERED AFFINITIES FOR HUMAN FCyRI, FCyRIIIa, AND C1q PROTEINS. According to the patent 
specifications, the drug is designed for: 
" the prevention or treatment of human diseases including but not limited to infectious diseases (including Respiratory Syncytial virus, Ebola virus, Influenza virus), cancer (including breast cancer and B cell lymphoma) and inflammatory diseases (including rheumatoid arthritis and Alzheimer's)."
The abstract for Z-Mapp patent US2013149300 is included below as well as an image of this dreadful virus.
Disclosed herein are GNGN and G1/G2 antibodies that recognize and bind various FcRs and C1q. Also disclosed herein are glycan-optiminzed antibodies, predominantly of the GNGN or G1/G2 glycoform, with enhanced Fcgamma receptor binding achieved through CHO, Nicotiana benthamiana and yeast manufacturing systems. Nucleic acids encoding these antibodies, as well as expression vectors and host cells including these nucleic acids are also disclosed herein. Methods and pharmaceutical compositions including the monoclonal antibodies are provided herein for the prevention and/or therapeutic treatment of viral infections, cancers and inflammatory diseases.

References
WHO 1– Global Alert and Response (GAR) – Ebola Virus disease updates – West Africa
WHO 2- Global Alert and Response  (GAR) – Ebola virus disease
Chneiweiss, H. (2003) Sur les rivages de la misère : Épisode 1 : Le marché des médicaments essentiels. M/S – Médecine Sciences,  vol 19(8&9), pp. 892-894.
WHO 3– Ethical considerations for the use of unregistered interventions for Ebola Virus disease
CDC – Ebola Hemorrhagic Fever
US Federal Regulations –Title 45 – Part 46 on the protection of human subjects
Code de la Santé Publique – Première Partie, Chapt. 1er, Titre II – Recherches biomédicales

Aug. 24, 2014 3:32 am - SFO CA 37.62 … 6.0 on the Richter magnitude scale and no stopping the earth from quaking